- Motorcycle cases can become heavily dependent on accident reconstruction.
- The driver’s version of events may conflict with yours.
- Police reports aren’t necessarily the final word on liability.
- Helmet use can become relevant to certain claims.
- Comparative-fault rules vary by jurisdiction.
- Vehicle damage can provide important evidence.
- Skid marks may disappear before they’re documented.
- Road conditions can become relevant.
- Poor road maintenance may introduce additional parties.
- Witnesses should be identified quickly.
- Motorcycle cameras can provide valuable evidence.
- Medical records may become central to the claim.
- Some injuries have delayed symptoms.
- Future treatment can affect damages.
- Insurance coverage may be more complicated than expected.
- The other driver’s liability limits may be inadequate.
- Uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage may matter.
- Don’t assume your own insurer automatically represents your interests.
- Settlement calculations should consider future losses.
- A quick settlement may prevent later claims depending on the agreement.
- Contingency fees should be explained before signing.
- Litigation expenses may be charged separately.
- Ask whether the attorney personally handles motorcycle cases.
- Ask whether accident reconstruction experts are used when appropriate.
- Don’t choose a lawyer solely because they specialize in motorcycle advertising.
Leave a Reply