- Mass torts aren’t the same as class actions.
- Individual claims may retain individual characteristics.
- Different injuries can produce different outcomes.
- Eligibility requirements matter.
- Medical records are crucial.
- Product exposure must often be established.
- Advertising can create unrealistic expectations.
- Settlement structures can vary.
- MDL proceedings can be complex.
- Bellwether trials don’t necessarily determine every case.
- Not every claimant receives the same settlement.
- Litigation can take years. Fees should be explained clearly.
- Case expenses should be explained.
- Medical liens may affect recovery.
- Government benefits may create reimbursement issues.
- Bankruptcy trusts can sometimes interact with claims.
- Prior settlements may affect strategy.
- Defendants may challenge causation.
- Experts can play a major role.
- Evidence preservation matters. Beware “everyone gets $X” advertising.
- Ask whether the firm is actually involved in the litigation.
- Ask how client cases are selected for litigation.
- Biggest mistake: believing a mass-tort advertisement’s headline settlement number represents what an individual claimant will receive.
Category: Legal
-
8. Mass Tort Lawyers. 25 Buyer-Beware Intelligence Points.
-
7. Wrongful Death Lawyers. 25 Buyer-Beware Intelligence Points.
- Wrongful-death laws vary significantly by jurisdiction.
- Not every family member necessarily has the same legal rights.
- Estate claims can differ from wrongful-death claims.
- Probate issues can become involved.
- Multiple beneficiaries may have competing interests.
- Insurance limits matter. Multiple defendants may exist.
- Government entities can have special rules.
- Medical malpractice can involve additional requirements.
- Evidence should be preserved immediately.
- Witness memories can fade.
- Accident reconstruction may be necessary.
- Economic damages can require financial experts.
- Future income may be considered.
- Loss-of-support calculations can be complicated.
- Funeral expenses may be recoverable depending on law.
- Non-economic damages vary by jurisdiction.
- Some jurisdictions impose statutory caps.
- Settlement allocation matters.
- Liens can reduce net recovery.
- Contingency agreements should be understood.
- Ask whether the firm actually litigates wrongful-death cases.
- Beware guaranteed settlement figures.
- Ask who will communicate with the family.
- Biggest mistake: treating wrongful death as simply a larger personal-injury claim.
-
6. Product Liability Lawyers. 25 Buyer-Beware Intelligence Points
- Product liability isn’t limited to manufacturing defects.
- Design defects are different.
- Failure-to-warn claims are different.
- Product identification can matter.
- Supply chains may contain multiple defendants.
- Retailers can have different responsibilities.
- Manufacturers may be located in another jurisdiction.
- Product modifications can complicate cases.
- Improper use may become an issue.
- Recall history can be important.
- Prior complaints may matter.
- Testing records can matter.
- Expert testimony is frequently important.
- Preserving the product can be critical.
- Don’t throw away the allegedly defective product.
- Photographs can become valuable evidence.
- Packaging should be preserved. Instructions and warnings should be preserved.
- Purchase records can matter.
- Warranty language may become relevant.
- Statutes of limitation vary.
- Mass claims can create different litigation structures.
- Beware lawyers making guaranteed-value claims.
- Ask about actual product-liability trial experience.
- Biggest mistake: discarding or modifying the product before it can be examined.
-
5. Maritime Injury Lawyers. 25 Buyer-Beware Intelligence Points
- Maritime law is highly specialized.
- Jones Act issues can arise.
- Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act issues can arise.
- Vessel status can matter.
- Worker status can matter.
- Seaman status can be disputed.
- Maintenance and cure rules are specialized.
- Employer negligence can have specialized standards.
- Unseaworthiness may be relevant.
- Vessel owners may have separate responsibilities.
- Contractual relationships can become complicated.
- Offshore employment creates additional considerations.
- Offshore drilling cases may involve multiple entities.
- Foreign vessels can introduce additional jurisdictional issues.
- Federal maritime law can override ordinary state assumptions.
- Deadlines matter.
- Evidence from vessel logs can be important.
- Safety records can be significant.
- Crew testimony may matter.
- Medical treatment documentation is important.
- Employer-provided medical care should be documented.
- Settlement agreements can affect future rights.
- Ask whether the lawyer routinely handles maritime cases.
- Don’t assume ordinary workers’ compensation rules apply.
- Biggest mistake: hiring an attorney unfamiliar with maritime law.
-
4. Mesothelioma Lawyers. 25 Buyer-Beware Intelligence Points
- Exposure history is critical.
- Multiple employers may be involved.
- Products and manufacturers may matter.
- Asbestos exposure can occur decades before diagnosis.
- Bankruptcy trusts may be relevant.
- Trust claims can interact with litigation.
- Different jurisdictions have different rules.
- Statutes of limitation matter.
- Medical documentation is essential.
- Occupational records can be important.
- Family members may have separate rights.
- Wrongful-death claims can differ from personal-injury claims.
- Settlement structures vary.
- Contingency agreements differ.
- Litigation costs should be explained.
- Ask whether the firm regularly handles asbestos cases.
- Ask about the firm’s experience with asbestos trusts.
- Beware unsupported settlement guarantees.
- Identify all potential exposure sources.
- Former coworkers may provide valuable evidence.
- Product identification can be difficult.
- Historical corporate ownership can matter.
- Venue can affect litigation.
- Speed can matter because of health circumstances.
- Biggest mistake: hiring a general personal-injury attorney without specialized asbestos experience.
-
3. Medical Malpractice Lawyers. 25 Buyer-Beware Intelligence Points
- Medical malpractice requires more than a bad medical outcome.
- Standard-of-care questions are central.
- Expert testimony is often critical.
- Statutes of limitation can be strict.
- Discovery rules can differ from ordinary injury cases.
- Medical records need careful review.
- Hospital liability may differ from physician liability.
- Independent-contractor status can matter.
- Nursing staff may have separate responsibilities.
- Pharmacy errors can create different defendants.
- Informed-consent issues are distinct from negligence.
- Pre-existing conditions can complicate damages.
- Causation can be difficult to establish.
- Medical expenses aren’t the only possible damages.
- Future treatment can affect valuation.
- Lost earning capacity can matter.
- Expert costs can be significant.
- Not every lawyer accepts malpractice cases.
- Ask about previous malpractice trials.
- Ask about the firm’s medical experts.
- Understand how litigation expenses are handled.
- Don’t assume a settlement is automatically advantageous.
- Confidentiality provisions may appear in settlements.
- Don’t delay obtaining legal advice.
- Biggest mistake: assuming that a poor medical outcome automatically means malpractice.
-
2. Personal Injury Lawyers. 25 Buyer-Beware Intelligence Points
- Not every personal-injury firm specializes in your type of injury.
- Advertising volume isn’t the same as litigation experience.
- Ask who personally handles the case.
- Determine whether the firm actually goes to trial.
- Understand the contingency percentage.
- Find out whether the percentage changes after litigation begins.
- Ask which expenses are deducted from the recovery.
- Medical liens can reduce your net recovery.
- Health-insurance reimbursement can complicate settlement.
- Workers’ compensation may create competing interests.
- Insurance limits can constrain recovery.
- Multiple defendants may create different strategies.
- Evidence should be preserved early.
- Social-media activity can become relevant.
- Medical documentation is critical.
- Gaps in treatment can become an issue.
- Settlement offers aren’t necessarily equivalent to case value.
- Ask how damages will be calculated.
- Future medical costs may require expert analysis.
- Lost earning capacity differs from immediate lost wages.
- Pain-and-suffering valuation isn’t a simple formula.
- Tax treatment can vary depending on the recovery.
- Ask how long comparable cases typically take.
- Beware promises of a specific settlement amount.
- Biggest mistake: assuming the lawyer promising the largest settlement is necessarily the best lawyer.
-
1. Truck Accident Lawyers. 25 Buyer-Beware Intelligence Points
- Not every truck accident attorney handles federal trucking regulations.
- Ask how many truck cases the firm handles annually.
- Experience with commercial carriers matters.
- Trucking cases can involve multiple potentially responsible parties.
- The driver’s employer may not be the only defendant.
- Maintenance contractors can become relevant.
- Cargo-loading companies can sometimes matter.
- Trucking-company insurance policies may be substantially different from ordinary auto policies.
- Multiple insurers can complicate negotiations.
- Evidence can disappear quickly.
- Electronic logging data may become important.
- Driver qualification records can matter.
- Vehicle inspection records can matter.
- Black-box/ECM data may be relevant.
- Accident reconstruction can become important.
- A lawyer who primarily handles ordinary auto collisions may not have the same specialized experience.
- Contingency percentages vary.
- Litigation expenses may be treated differently between firms.
- Ask whether expert-witness costs are advanced.
- Ask what happens if the case is unsuccessful.
- Settlement authority and negotiation strategy matter.
- Beware guarantees about settlement amounts.
- Ask who will actually handle your case.
- Understand the fee agreement before signing.
- Biggest mistake: choosing a lawyer based solely on advertising prominence rather than relevant trucking-litigation experience.