- “Wealth management” can mean very different things from one firm to another.
- Fees can exist at multiple levels.
- Asset-management fees are not necessarily the only fees.
- Advisory fees may be percentage-based.
- Product commissions may create conflicts.
- Certain products can carry embedded expenses.
- Portfolio performance should be evaluated net of all relevant costs.
- A high-performing portfolio may simply have taken more risk.
- Benchmark selection matters.
- Risk tolerance should not be confused with risk capacity.
- Liquidity needs matter.
- Concentration can quietly build over time.
- Tax consequences matter.
- Retirement objectives matter.
- Estate planning may require coordination with other professionals.
- Insurance may be recommended for legitimate reasons—but costs and incentives should be understood.
- Alternative investments can introduce illiquidity and complexity.
- Proprietary products deserve extra scrutiny.
- Conflicts of interest should be disclosed and understood.
- “Personalized” does not necessarily mean comprehensive.
- A famous firm does not automatically mean a suitable adviser.
- Past investment performance does not guarantee future performance.
- Changing advisers can create transaction and tax consequences.
- You should know exactly who has custody of your assets.
- The most important question may be “How are you compensated?”
B. PREMIUM BUYER CHECKLIST
ADVISER
☐ Adviser identity verified
☐ Firm identity verified
☐ Qualifications reviewed
☐ Relevant registration/licensing checked for your jurisdiction
☐ Disciplinary/background information reviewed where applicable
☐ Experience with similar clients confirmed
SERVICES
☐ Investment management
☐ Retirement planning
☐ Tax coordination
☐ Estate-planning coordination
☐ Insurance planning
☐ Cash-flow planning
☐ Business/exit planning
☐ Risk management
Clearly distinguish what the adviser actually provides from what is merely available through partners or referrals.
COMPENSATION
☐ Advisory fee
☐ Asset-management fee
☐ Product commissions
☐ Transaction costs
☐ Fund expenses
☐ Custody fees
☐ Planning fees
☐ Performance-based fees, if any
☐ Other administrative fees
PORTFOLIO
☐ Investment philosophy documented
☐ Risk profile documented
☐ Benchmark identified
☐ Asset allocation explained
☐ Concentration reviewed
☐ Liquidity needs incorporated
☐ Tax implications considered
☐ Alternative investments explained
CONFLICTS
Ask:
☐ Do you receive commissions?
☐ Do you receive compensation from third parties?
☐ Do you recommend proprietary products?
☐ Do you have minimum account requirements?
☐ Are there products you cannot recommend?
☐ Who is the custodian?
☐ How are referrals compensated?
REPORTING
☐ Statements explained
☐ Performance reporting understood
☐ Fees visible
☐ Account access verified
☐ Custody arrangements understood
☐ Complaint/escalation procedure known
FINAL COST TEST
Calculate:
Advisory Fees + Product Fees + Fund Expenses + Transaction Costs + Other Charges
Then compare that total against the expected benefit of the service.
FINAL QUESTION
If I could see every dollar this relationship generates for everyone involved, would I still choose it?
Leave a Reply